Loading organizations...
§ Private Profile · 1116 Wilshire Blvd, Santa Monica, California, 90401, United States
An online presence operating within the broad technology sector, encompassing various related fields, applications, and market areas.
Invested.in is an entity operating within the technology sector, though its precise operational focus and geographical headquarters are not publicly known. Comprehensive details regarding Invested.in's operational scale, including any reported funding rounds, asset under management, or current valuation figures, are not available in public records. The organization has not disclosed metrics such as its employee headcount, user base, or any technical indicators like GitHub stars, making an assessment of its market presence challenging. Furthermore, information concerning any lead investors, key portfolio companies, or prominent customers associated with Invested.in remains undisclosed. No recognizable individuals, including founders or executive leadership, have been publicly identified in connection with the entity, nor is its founding year known. This lack of public data limits a comprehensive understanding of Invested.in's market position and strategic direction within the broader technology landscape.
Invested.in has raised $880K across 2 funding rounds.
Key people at Invested.in.
Invested.in was founded in 2010 by Howard Marks (Co-Founder and CEO).
Invested.in has raised $880K in total across 2 funding rounds.
Invested.in was founded in 2010 by Howard Marks (Co-Founder and CEO).
Invested.in has raised $880K in total across 2 funding rounds.
Invested.in's investors include Alan Stern, Brad Schwartz, Chairul Irawan, Christopher Grey, David Carter, Gordon Crawford, Irv Weintraub, Kamran Pourzanjani, Mark Kolokotrones, Mark Schwartz, Michael Liou, Steven Roussey.
Invested.in has raised $880K across 2 funding rounds. Most recently, it raised $830K Seed in October 2012.
| Date | Round | Lead Investors | Other Investors | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2012 | $830K Seed | — | Alan Stern, Brad Schwartz, Chairul Irawan, Christopher Grey, David Carter, Gordon Crawford, IRV Weintraub, Kamran Pourzanjani, Mark Kolokotrones, Mark Schwartz, Michael Liou, Steven Roussey, Steve Reich, Terry KAY, Amplify.LA, Canyon Creek Capital, Karlin Ventures | Announced |
| Jan 20, 2012 | $50K Venture Round | Amplify.LA | — | Announced |
Key people at Invested.in.
No verifiable information confirms the existence of a technology company named Invested.in. Search results across investment firms, tech sector analyses, and innovation reports yield no matches for this entity as either an investment firm or a portfolio company[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. It does not appear in discussions of tech investors, startups, or notable players in software, fintech, AI, or related fields.
Without sourced details on mission, products, sectors, or growth, Invested.in cannot be classified as a known technology company or firm. It may be a defunct project, a non-public initiative, or a misremembered name similar to generic "invested.in" domains, but no evidence supports active operations or impact.
Search results provide no founding details, key partners, founders, or backstory for Invested.in[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. No records of its emergence, early traction, or evolution appear in tech investment histories, which highlight established players like Warburg Pincus (active 40+ years in tech) or companies like Palantir (founded 2003)[1][5].
Unable to identify unique aspects due to lack of data:
Invested.in plays no documented role in tech trends like AI, IoT, cloud computing, or semiconductors, which dominate current analyses[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Market forces favor established innovators (e.g., Nvidia's AI dominance, ASML's lithography monopoly), but this entity is absent from ecosystem discussions[3][4][5].
Without confirmed existence or activity, Invested.in has no observable trajectory or influence[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Future trends in tech (e.g., frontier AI, robotics) will shape proven players, not unverified names. Investors should verify via official registries before considering engagement, as this lacks the momentum of hyper-growth firms averaging 50% expansion[1].